1. One of my favorite filmmakers, Don Hertzfeldt, has put out the third part of his World of Tomorrow series. I love these movies. They're dense with surreal beauty, existential sadness, absurdist humor, and ideas. How I love the ideas.
Is it better or worse than It's Such a Beautiful Day? Probably worse. But World of Tomorrow still needs a lot more watching and rewatching to get everything out of it.
Here is the first part of the World of Tomorrow series
2. Blogger MetaLevelUp Metalevels criticism of my post about rewiring your brain. He's diplomatic about it - accurately describing my view and finding common ground.
I plan to write a full post which will hopefully make some clear cuts to divide the issue usefully. Maybe I'm wrong, but let me try to be right first to see if that works out.
3. Stalin said a single death is a tragedy and a million deaths is a statistic (Thanos snap = statistic, Tony Stark death = tragedy). Apparently, there's research that confirms this idea, The More Who Die The Less We Care.
"We analyze valence, arousal, and specific emotional content of over 100,000 mentions of death in news articles and social media posts, and find that language shows an increase in valence (i.e., decreased negative affect) and a decrease in arousal when describing mortality of larger numbers of people."
Sam Harris frequently points this out in his podcast, and Paul Bloom says it's a serious flaw in empathy. It also reminds me of Adam Smith's little finger.
This is all to say, stop caring so much about stories close to you and care more about the calculus of human suffering
4. 18 misconceptions about the state of the world.
Test yourself on other common misconceptions.
5. "Go ahead and flag this tweet for when we do not have a vaccine by the end of the year"
Our collective consciousness has a short memory for failed predictions like this. We need to Stop listening to people who make bold predictions and turn out wrong.
We also have a Mr. Irwin Redlener on MSNBS saying it is "impossible" so have a vaccine by the end of the year.
"Once you fully absorb the distinction between what sounds good and what is good, however, the implied political danger will weigh upon your mind."
7. Tyler Cowen on whether to take UFO reports seriously,
"The major reason I take UFO reports seriously is simply the “gradient” of other people who take them seriously — the people with the very highest security clearances! It is not just Brennan and Harry Reid, there are others too, namely people with the very highest level of security clearance who believe these issues deserve further investigation, and are not just weather phenomena, instrument mistakes, weather balloons, etc."This is inspired by a conversation Tyler had with a former director of the CIA.
"I think there's a category of thing where the act of putting words on it disrupts it, so you cannot communicate the thing because in communicating it you've ruined it."
"After I decided to not die, then everything after that became a choice. It was like, okay I'm going to push away death and I'm going to push away all the things that I haven't been pushing away before. I'm going to push away my acceptance for anxiety, and suddenly it became like everything that I was doing became integrated with me like an agent thing. Like instead of anxiety happening to me, I was choosing to do anxiety because I was choosing to not die."
Aella also wrote some of my favorite pieces of writing, The Trauma Narrative and Blame-Game Theory.
"1. Intelligence is associated with patience and hence higher savings rates;
2. Intelligence causes cooperation;
3. Higher group intelligence opens the door to using fragile, high value production technologies, and
4. Intelligence is associated with supporting market-oriented policies. "
"For every mile walked drunk, turns out to be eight times more dangerous than the mile driven drunk."
Drunk walking may be more dangerous than you think it is, but remember
Question: is the average drunk walker is more or less drunk than the average drunk driver?
This is actually hilarious pic.twitter.com/ml3c3GquRU
— Greg Price (@greg_price11) November 10, 2020
Here's what's going on:
The usual suspects are trying to retroactively write the rules of the game so that their gay guy wins. The two games:
A. The first gay senate confirmed person to serve in the cabinet on a permanent basis (Pete Buttigieg - Biden appointed)
B. The first gay person to serve in the cabinet position role (Richard Grenell - Trump appointed)
The Trump guy did serve in the role of acting director of national intelligence - a cabinet-level position. Acting meaning he temporarily took on all the duties as the director of national intelligence until they found another guy.
Consider as an analogy: If Kamela Harris had to fill in for the last 3 months of Joe Biden at the end of his term because he got Coronavirus, would she then be the first female president?
I'll let you decide who's doing more mental gymnastics.
16. Remember these?
"people often use the fact that they have a right to do something as an excuse for doing it. As a justification... But, and I think it is a very dangerous way of thinking. Because we have a right to be jerks. We have a right to be unpleasant. And, I think that's good. I think that's an essential part of a free society, is that we aren't--we can't be coerced to be good people, to be a decent people."
When losing an argument, people subtly turn the subject of the conversation from whether X is true or good, to whether they have the right to believe X or do X.
Another quote from the interview:
"I think people on the Left have alienated a lot of fellow citizens by acting as if the only way to argue for that is to say that health care is a right, is an entitlement. And, you could just say, 'Well, whether or not it's a right, it's something that, if we're affluent enough, if we have the ability to do it'"21. Research and data: The tendency for interpersonal victimhood: The personality construct and its consequences (Sci-Hub Link).
This is not a personality construct I score high in. |
"There really is a fetishization of victimhood, to the point where people of my daughter's generation like to make up social groups that are oppressed and join them so that they can be part of the oppressed."
"I think people when they read newspapers there's already a set of categories to which they're placing people, so if you make yourself a little bit difficult to place, you become a Rorschach test."
23. Two key graphs to take away from the More In Common American Fabric Survey showing progressive activists are out of touch... and in touch.
24. A big thank you goes out to Freakonomics podcast for making my 6-hour car trip very enjoyable. Listen to Does Advertising Actually Work part 1 and 2, and Does Anyone Know What Socialism Actually Is?
25. After a winter hiatus that ended up taking an entire year, Rationally Speaking with Julia Galef is back. The first episode tries to answer the question, Are Boomers Responsible for Millenials' Struggles? It pulls from three different interviews with three different perspectives.
After listening to the interviews, Julia's assessment,
26. France is Bacon"While the serial option and lottery ticket buyers seem like different creatures, they are, in fact, close cousins. Both types postpone their dreams and undertake choices that they think will enable their dreams. But they fail to understand that all of these intervening choices will change them fundamentally—and they are, in fact, the sum total of those choices.
The shortest distance between two points is reliably a straight line. If your dreams are apparent to you, pursue them. Creating optionality and buying lottery tickets are not way stations on the road to pursuing your dreamy outcomes. They are dangerous diversions that will change you."
The point of this essay is at odds with a lot of what is taught (assumed) in economics.
32. "Significantly more fathers reported having been unfaithful in the current relationship than non-fathers (30.7% vs. 17.2%)"Stalin once said that “those who vote decide nothing; those who count the votes decide everything.” It’s starting to look like those who do the studies decide nothing and those who report the studies decide everything. The only solution is to actually read the study and not just the headlines. Sometimes we might even have to – God help us – read beyond the abstract.
34. There was a satirical study in 2018 finding that parachutes don't prevent death or injury. The punchline is that the plane was parked.
It reminds me that the idea that putting cloth over your face will block saliva from going in and coming out should be the default view.
35. Did the WHO change the definition of Herd Immunity?
Obviously, as a reasonable person, I believe that science has discovered a new definition of herd immunity because that's totally how definitions work.
36. Elizabeth Kim on how ideologies are snow globes.
IncludedSpencer Greenberg's 4 components of ideology:
A. Sacred values (think 3 languages of politics)
B. A simple model of how the world works (too simple)
C. Sense of identity (I am a...)
D. People (us, them, and neutrals)
37. Michael Huemer and Steve Patterson disagree on the metaphysics of mathematics.
This podcast kept me up until 3am. Highly recommended.
No comments:
Post a Comment